Suchergebnisse

"Teaching International Political Sociology" published on by Oxford University Press.

"The International Political Sociology of Empire" published on by Oxford University Press.

"The International Political Sociology of Risk" published on by Oxford University Press.

Examines how international law is portrayed in sociological analyses, sociology's impact on the study of international law; & the kind of topics available for multidisciplinary cooperation between international political sociology & international law. Three international political sociology papers focused on law are used to address these issues. References. D. Edelman

"Transformations of War: Perspectives from International Political Sociology" published on by Oxford University Press.

An editorial describes the goals of this journal, which include the creation of a stimulating and influential meeting ground between work in sociology, political theory, and international studies. Adapted from the source document.

This forum opens a debate that is long overdue: for far too long, the fields of international political sociology (IPS) and international political economy (IPE) have been standing apart. Discussions take place in different conference sections, in different networks that publish in different journals. Yet, this divide is surprising given that the two fields share similar trajectories, theoretical concerns, problématiques, and conceptual challenges. This forum starts exploring this shared terrain: we believe that there is no a priori reason to separate the sociocultural, the political and the economic when we aim at making sense of the world in any meaningful way. We propose that bridging the IPE-IPS divide has tremendous potential for the development of a socio-political economy analysis that, we believe, has two benefits. First, it allows for the opening of new empirical terrains or deepening and widening existing ones. Second, bringing IPE/S back together creates reflexive spaces for more holistic, embodied and contextualised conceptual innovation. The contributors to this forum show each in their own way such empirical and conceptual added value of moving beyond the IPE and IPS divide in order to develop what we call here a socio-political economy of the globe. They focus on various issues, such as the transformation of capitalism from an oil- to a data-dependent accumulation regime with the rising of the so-called 'digital age' (Chenou); the profound social, economic and political transformation triggered by urbanisation in the development world (Elias, Rethel and Tilley); emerging global risks and the neglected role of the insurance industry (Lobo-Guerrero); regional development-security nexuses (Lopez Lucia); and business power in climate change diplomacy (Moussu).